"This circumstance [of an expanding Universe] irritates
me," by Einstein in an old letter to de Sitter. And in another
letter about the expanding Universe, "To admit such
possibilities seems senseless."
#1 Supporter - Arthur Eddington, in Nature 127, 1931, 450:
1. "Philosophically, the notion of a beginning of the present
order of Nature is repugnant to me. … I should like to find a
2. "Eddington also claimed that his version of events could
explain something emerging from nothing, thanks to some
rather dubious logic." (really, no logic at all) Reported by
Simon Singh in his 2004 book - "Big Bang" page 281.
3. And in 1923 '"Friedmann formulates the results of his first
cosmological paper in just a few sentences: ... "This brings to
mind what the Hindu mythology has to say about cycles of
existence, and it also becomes possible to speak about 'the
creation of the world from nothing,' " "' Reported in the 1993
book: "Alexander A Friedmann: The Man Who Made the
Universe Expand" page 156-7 by Eduard A .Tropp et all.
Such is the mentality of framers of current Standard Big Bang
Model set from Einstein's general relativity in 1915 to its
current plastered form that emerged in early 1940's. Namely
these math based assumptions [Note: these assumptions have
no scientific basis of any kind.] or philosophical concepts:
ARE To Be Pruned!
That out of Nothing,
the Big Bang created Space, Time, and Matter.
That our Universe is curved and Space is expanding.
That distribution of Matter is Homogeneous, Isotropic.
That every position will see the same as any other viewer.
That Earth has no preferred position.
Fireball of the Big Bang was necessary to forge Hydrogen, Helium.
A. The growing distance between galaxies can be more easily
explained by a push from an explosion in energy-filled space
(using everyday physics, easily demonstrated), than the
unbelievable concept of expanding space.
Supporting this new energy-filled space concept is the fact
that rapidly expanding space, could not form any structure -
only FOG! Expanding space is assumed to move Earth's
local family of galaxies at 600 kilometers per second (375 m/s)
and all other galaxies faster, with velocities reaching up to
speed of light. Nothing could assemble under such powerful
See what Michael S. Turner has to say about expanding space
[also known as the cosmological constant] (as reported by K. C. Cole) :
1. "We want it [cosmological constant] here today
And gone yesterday." - [So To Eliminate FOG!]
2. In a different interview He says: "However, the most
intriguing possibility is that there is no dark energy at all,
that we simply do not understand gravity and COSMIC
ACCELERATION is the first clue to going beyond Einstein's
theory." For complete interview see:
New HiTech Findings:
B. COSMIC ACCELERATION [Explained with real physics]:
Push equals distribution - Supernovae distribution is a mirror
image of a GRB [Gamma Ray Burst] power graph. See GRB
Trigger 1406 for a reasonable graph of the Big Bang Push.
[No assumed expanding, accelerating space, or dark energy
required to explain the distribution of Supernovae. Just an
Big Bang explosion IN SPACE !]
C. Earth is dead center of the Spherical CMB [Cosmic
Microwave Background Radiation] and of the 2dF Quasar,
donut-shaped, graphs. No quasars near Earth; they all start
virtually 2 billion light years away in EVERY direction.
[A simple explanation is due to the fact that although Earth's
local family of galaxies is moving at the Olympic speed of
600 kilometers per second, we are about the slowest object in
the Universe - some 0.2% of the speed of light. Virtually all
other galaxies are going much faster, leaving us crawling at
the starting gate - virtually dead center. Due to the Big Bang
explosion IN SPACE !]
D. Tests proving general relativity limited to orbits of Mercury
and other Earth bound satellites. [This does not prove homogeneity.]
E. Einstein reported in his last autobiography that he could not
ever apply general relativity to the whole field [Universe],
only to gravitationally bound systems like the orbit of Mercury.
Nor can anyone else do so today.
[Again - this means NO homogeneity, therefore there are no
known theoretical restrictions. Earth's location is unique!]
F. Space is not curved. See Einstein's Cross of multiple images
surrounding a foreground galaxy. Only one image is possible
in curved space. This multiple image proves that light bends
in a gravitational field, not due to curved space. See also
Abell's halo [Astronomical picture of the day - Abell 2218]
[Curved space could never explain a halo. This halo denies
Willem de Sitter's expanding space concept, which requires
curved space as proof of his mathematical assumptions.]
G. E = mc2
Matter created from light energy accomplished at Stanford in
'97. E = mc2 Reversed ! [Equation of the Big Bang IN SPACE !]
Thoughts about the assumed Singleton forming in NOTHING:
1. The creation of Hydrogen and Helium required a very hot
beginning; with basic building blocks of matter moving at
near infinite speeds. [This is required.][But not the following.]
2. To construct a singleton, a pinpoint of basic matter
sufficient to supply all the needs of our 100+ billion galaxy
Universe means that such dense matter would have no room
for the near infinite motion required to create Hydrogen and
[Infinite motion & infinite density together as a
singleton is impossible - a Paradox !]
3. We know of no means to compress atoms into such a dense
point as the theoretical singleton requires, except a huge
4. Out of NOTHING, where did nature get a huge gravitational
field and all the material necessary to produce a singleton?
And then, why should this dense mass explode?
[Not possible out of NOTHING - that Hindu myth used by
Friedman. See next entry for the singleton's replacement.]
Thoughts on the size of the ARENA OF SPACE necessary
to incur a Big Bang:
The Universe's ARENA OF SPACE is intimately related to
the huge energy needs of the inexhaustible electrons,
found with the undying proton,
located within each atom. And no battery !
Source of power must be external,
operating at some frequency beyond our current technological
ability to detect,
running today, unimpeded like a current in a very large
supercooled circuit -
and must operate for a trillion cubed years minimum
(the estimated minimum life of a proton.) An almost
infinitely large ARENA OF SPACE must exist to contain
such energy. Including energy that powered the Big Bang.
[ A very simple demonstration is available. ]
[The huge wild volume of energy in this ARENA OF SPACE
exhausted every possible turbulent pattern of motion till finally
this nameless energy converged upon a single point, thus setting
the conditions necessary for the conversion of energy into matter
[as proved by Stanford] thereby igniting the Big Bang IN SPACE.]
Thoughts on the CMB temperature uniformity that
cosmologists ponder with disbelief over:
1. To deny the ability for the CMB's ions to lose motion
uniformly in different locations of space is for scientists to
deny the replication of experimental outcomes.
2. If a thousand scientists performed the same experiment
using identical equipment, they should get identical results.
The same with nature. A field of growing wheat produces
identical results when all elements are alike. Same with the
CMB's identical temperature in every direction.
[Note: an explosion IN SPACE is by far the simplest
explanation that can explain this equality and Earth's central
location vis-à-vis the CMB and quasar graphs.]
3. So, the Big Bang's Thermonuclear Conversion of Energy
found in the Arena of Space shoots out the equivalent of a
cannon's smoke ring when fired. Except that instead of a
smoke ring it is a spherical smoke ring of outrushing matter,
going out at 95-99% of the speed of light, now some 13.7
billion light years away in EVERY direction. With equal
distance we have equal temperature. We have equal distance
because Earth is moving so slow, relative to all celestial objects.
[Consequently, we Earthlings are in a very unique location -
right next to the epicenter of the Big Bang explosion - the
Center of our Universe.]
Timing = Age of the Universe:
Time for the spherical smoke ring to reach this viewed location
requires a minimum of 13.7 billion years and another 13.7 for
the radiation to return to us the very slow moving Earth. That
equals a round trip of 27.4 billion years minimum - the
minimum age of our Universe.
Earth's view of the CMB's radiation is like seeing a family
photo of a 13.7 year old child that took 13.7 years to deliver to
us Earthlings a 27.4 year old recipient.
[Plenty of time now for structures to form. The youngest object
in the Universe that we see, cannot be younger than the 13.7
billion year old CMB, thereby giving the force of gravity
billions of years of unhurried construction to form galaxies.]
My new analysis of the relationship between the electron's
power requirements and the ARENA OF SPACE, and all
the latest HiTech findings allows me to:
Put all the above evidence together in one logical analysis and the
conclusion must be a Big Bang Thermonuclear Conversion of
Energy found in the pre-existing huge energy-filled arena of space.
And this puts the very slow moving Earth virtually right in the
Center of our 27.4 billion year old Universe.
All evidence presented is documented by the likes of NASA
or equivalent source.
Science finds the Tools; Philosophy seeks the Craftsman.